This is a key distressed market to follow since Las Vegas has seen the largest price decline of any of the Case-Shiller composite 20 cities. Prices, as of the November report, were off 61.6% from the peak according to Case-Shiller, and off 9.2% over the last year. Prices just keep falling. Sales in 2011 were at record levels, more than during the bubble, and it looks like 2012 will be an even stronger year.

From the LVGAR: GLVAR January 2012 Housing StatisticsGLVAR reported that 48,186 local properties were sold in 2011, including 38,153 single-family homes and 10,033 condominiums and townhomes. That broke GLVAR’s all-time sales record set in 2009, when it reported 46,879 total sales. In 2010, GLVAR reported 43,877 total sales.

“At the rate we’re going, 2012 has the potential to be another record sales year,” she said.

According to GLVAR, the total number of local homes, condominiums and townhomes sold in the traditionally slow sales month of January was 3,591. That’s down from 4,250 in December 2011, but up from 3,214 total sales in January 2011.
...
The total number of homes listed for sale on GLVAR’s Multiple Listing Service decreased from December to January, with a total of 19,160 single-family homes listed for sale at the end of the month. That’s down 0.4 percent from 19,230 single-family homes listed for sale at the end of December and down 12.9 percent from one year ago. GLVAR reported a total of 4,133 condos and townhomes listed for sale on its MLS at the end of January. That’s up 1.8 percent from 4,061 condos and townhomes listed in December, but down 25.6 percent from one year ago.
...
In January, GLVAR reported that 52.5 percent of all existing homes sold in Southern Nevada were purchased with cash. That’s up from 50.8 percent in December. Meanwhile, 28.1 percent of all existing local homes sold during January were short sales ... Bank-owned homes accounted for 45.5 percent of all existing home sales in January, down from 46.0 percent in December 2011.So 73.6% of the sales were distressed, and over half were purchased with cash.

One of the keys is the decline in inventory. Note that the GLVAR reports both total inventory, and inventory excluding "contingent" listings (usually short sales). Total single family inventory was down 12.9% from a year ago, and excluding contingent listings, inventory was down 35.8%!

Yesterday Goldman Goldman Sachs economist Sven Jari Stehn argued that the labor force participation rate would remain "broadly flat at 63.7% through the end of 2013". He argued there would be a cyclical boost to the participation rate this year from the recovering economy, but a structural decline in the participation rate due to demographics. (Note: some decline in the participation rate has been expected over the next couple of decades).

The updated population controls from the 2010 Census showed a higher percentage of younger and older workers compared to the prime working age group (25 to 54), and also more women (participation rate is lower for women) than originally estimated - so the aggregate participation rate is now at 63.7%. Stehn argues that structural factors alone could push the aggregate participation rate down further to 63.1% by the end of 2012, but that this will probably be offset by more people returning to the labor force as the economy recovers.

The participation rate plays a key role in calculating to unemployment rate. First a few definitions from the BLS Glossary:

• Civilian noninstitutional population: Included are persons 16 years of age and older residing in the 50 States and the District of Columbia who are not inmates of institutions (for example, penal and mental facilities, homes for the aged), and who are not on active duty in the Armed Forces.

• Labor force: The labor force includes all persons classified as employed or unemployed in accordance with the definitions contained in this glossary.

• Labor force participation rate: The labor force as a percent of the civilian noninstitutional population.

• Unemployment rate: The unemployment rate represents the number unemployed as a percent of the labor force.

So a lower participation rate - with the same level of employment - would mean a lower unemployment rate.

Below is a table showing the sensitivity of the unemployment rate to three levels of the participation rate (centered around Goldman's forecast) and three rates of job creation for 2012. (note: this is mixing two different surveys - the household survey for the participation rate and unemployment rate, and the establishment survey for payroll jobs. Over time these two surveys move together, but there can be significant variability in the short run). December 2012 Unemployment Rate based on Jobs added and Participation Rate Participation Rate63.4%63.7%64.0%Jobs added per month (000s)1507.6%8.0%8.5%2007.2%7.7%8.1%2506.9%7.3%7.8%
If the January pace of payroll employment growth continues (around 250 thousand jobs per month), and the participation rate stays at 63.7%, then the unemployment rate could fall to 7.3% in December 2012. But even at a slower pace of payroll growth, the unemployment rate could be at or below 8% by the end of the year - unless the participation rate rises or the economy slows sharply.

The recent FOMC projections (see below) are for the unemployment rate to be in the 8.2% to 8.5% range by Q4 2012, and perhaps the FOMC was expecting the participation rate to increase this year.

If the participation rate doesn't increase, and payroll growth continues (even at 150 thousand per month), then the FOMC projections are too high. But even if the FOMC revises down their unemployment rate forecast, they will still view a 7.5% to 8% unemployment rate at the end of 2012 as unacceptably high.

Unemployment projections of Federal Reserve Governors and Reserve Bank presidents Unemployment Rate1201220132014 January 2012 Projections8.2 to 8.57.4 to 8.16.7 to 7.61 Projections for the unemployment rate are for the average civilian unemployment rate in the fourth quarter of the year indicated.

From the MBA: Refinance Activity Increases as Rates Hit Survey Lows
The Refinance Index increased 9.4 percent from the previous week. The seasonally adjusted Purchase Index increased 0.1 percent from one week earlier.

The average contract interest rate for 30-year fixed-rate mortgages with conforming loan balances ($417,500 or less) decreased to 4.05 percent, the lowest rate in the history of the survey, from 4.09 percent ...

The average contract interest rate for 30-year fixed-rate mortgages with jumbo loan balances (greater than $417,500)decreased to 4.29 percent, the lowest rate in the history of the survey, from 4.33 percent ...The purchase index is still moving sideways at a very low level, but I expect the changes to HARP to lead to a surge in refinance activity in March.

From the WSJ: Concession Smooths Way Toward a Greek Debt Deal
The European Central Bank has made key concessions over its holdings of Greek government bonds ... The ECB has agreed to exchange the government bonds it purchased in the secondary market last year at a price below face value ...

The idea is for the ECB, in effect, to exchange its Greek bonds for bonds of the European Financial Stability Facility ... The EFSF ... will return the bonds to Greece, and Greece will then agree to repay the EFSF for the price at which the fund bought the bonds from the ECB ... officials said the ECB's concessions could contribute a maximum €11 billion to fill a gap estimated at some €15 billionThe ECB would break even, or might even make a small profit on the transaction. A similar plan would probably help Portugal and Ireland too.

From the Financial Times: Greece misses bail-out deadline
Greece missed another deadline ... on Tuesday night ... [Prime Minister] Lucas Papademos ... would hold the talks on Wednesday morning and expected a deal to be presented for approval at a meeting of eurozone finance ministers later in the week.
excerpt with permissionI still think a deal is likely.

From MarketWatch: New York AG cancels bank settlement statementNew York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman late Tuesday postponed a much anticipated conference call with reporters that was set up to announce whether the state would participate in broad a settlement with five big banks over foreclosure practices.Uh, never mind.

From Diana Olick at CNBC (video at 4:30 PM): New York state Attorney General Eric Schneiderman will make a statement at 6 PM ET.

Olick speculates that if Schneiderman announces New York is joining the settlement that that might mean he has to drop the suit against MERS that was recently filed.

Update: From Bloomberg: States With Highest Foreclosure Rates Among Bank Deal HoldoutsCalifornia, New York, Nevada, Florida and Massachusetts are among the handful of states that haven’t signed a deal with banks over foreclosure abuses ... California Attorney General Kamala Harris and New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman, who have been some of the most outspoken in pushing for changes to the deal, were among those who hadn’t joined as of yesterday’s deadline.
...
Bank of America Corp., JPMorgan Chase & Co. and Wells Fargo & Co. made a last-minute demand that New York drop claims filed against them Feb. 3 as a condition of the foreclosure settlement ... The push by the three banks raised an obstacle in getting Schneiderman’s support for the deal, said the person.

In a research note released last night, Goldman Sachs economist Sven Jari Stehn looked at the population revisions from the 2010 Census and argued that there is "No Labor Force Participation Rebound in Sight".

This is a key point. Some of the recent decline in the participation rate was expected due to demographics (mostly aging of the population), but most analysts expected some rebound in the participation rate this year as the economy (hopefully) improves. Goldman is now expecting the participation rate to stay flat through 2013.

From Stehn:
The demographic structure of the population matters because participation follows a distinct life cycle: it rises with age as teens enter the labor force, reaches a plateau between ages 25 and 55, and falls sharply thereafter due to retirement. Moreover, participation is higher for prime-age men than women, mostly due to child bearing. This life-cycle pattern can be seen by splitting the working-age population into four groups: young individuals (aged 16-24 years), prime-age men (25-54), prime-age women (25-54), and older individuals (55+). Specifically, in 2011 prime-aged individuals had much higher participation rates (89% for men, 75% for women) than young (at 55%) or older individuals (at 40%). The updated population controls from the 2010 Census revealed an increase in young and older workers relative to prime-age ones, pushing down the estimate for the aggregate participation rate.
...
[O]ur model suggests that the participation rate will remain broadly flat at 63.7% through the end of 2013This is very important. Although I expect the participation rate to decline over the next couple of decades as the population ages, I thought the participation rate would rise a little in 2012. If the participation rate stays steady at 63.7%, then the unemployment rate would fall quicker than I had expected (and possibly quicker than the Fed expected too). I'll add some calculations later.

This is a reminder that we can't just look at the participation rate and the overall employment-population ratio (the ratio of employed to over 16 population).

Click on graph for larger image.

During this period of a significant shift in demographics, it helps to look at the employment-population ratio for the prime working age group (25 to 54 years old). This leaves out most changes in demographics, although there are more women than originally thought, so that impacts this ratio too.

For this key demographic, it appears the employment situation for men is improving a little, but the employment situation for women is still lagging behind.

From the BLS: Job Openings and Labor Turnover Summary
There were 3.4 million job openings on the last business day of December, up from 3.1 million in November, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics reported today.
...
Although the number of job openings remained below the 4.4 million openings when the recession began in December 2007, the number of job openings has increased 39 percent since the end of the recession in June 2009.
The following graph shows job openings (yellow line), hires (dark blue), Layoff, Discharges and other (red column), and Quits (light blue column) from the JOLTS.

This is a new series and only started in December 2000.

Note: The difference between JOLTS hires and separations is similar to the CES (payroll survey) net jobs headline numbers. This report is for December, the most recent employment report was for January.

Click on graph for larger image.

Notice that hires (dark blue) and total separations (red and light blue columns stacked) are pretty close each month. When the blue line is above the two stacked columns, the economy is adding net jobs - when it is below the columns, the economy is losing jobs.

Jobs openings increased in December, and the number of job openings (yellow) has generally been trending up, and are up about 15% year-over-year compared to December 2010.

Quits declined slightly in December, but have mostly been trending up - quits are now up about 5% year-over-year. These are voluntary separations and more quits might indicate some improvement in the labor market. (see light blue columns at bottom of graph for trend for "quits").
All current employment graphs

Here is a serious incentive to do a short sale ... from Bloomberg: Banks Paying U.S. Homeowners to Avoid Foreclosures(ht Mike in Long Island)Banks ... are offering as much as $35,000 or more in cash to delinquent homeowners to sell their properties for less than they owe.
...
Karen Farley hadn’t made a mortgage payment in a year when she got what looked like a form letter from her lender.

“You could sell your home, owe nothing more on your mortgage and get $30,000,” JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) said in the Aug. 17 letter obtained by Bloomberg News.
...
Farley ... said the New York-based bank agreed to let her sell her San Marcos, California, home for $592,000 -- about $200,000 less than what she owes. The $30,000 will cover moving costs and the rental deposit for her next home. Farley, who is also approved for an additional $3,000 through a federal incentive program, is scheduled to close the deal Feb. 10.
...
JPMorgan, the biggest U.S. bank, approves about 5,000 short sales a month. It generally offers $10,000 to $35,000 in cash payments at settlement, real estate agents said. Not all of the sales include incentives.Unfortunately it seems there are still many suspicious short sales. It is common to see a home initially listed as "contingent" or "pending" at a price well below market - meaning the agent or seller already had a buyer lined up. If the banks are paying an incentive for those deals, they are losing twice!

But none of the key holdout states have signed on yet ...

From Bloomberg: Mortgage Accord Has More Than 40 States Signed On, Iowa SaysMore than 40 states have signed on to a settlement over mortgage-servicing practices ... This enables us to move forward into the very final stages of remaining work,” Iowa Attorney General Tom Miller said in a statement today ...

Nevada Attorney General Catherine Cortez Masto said today she wouldn’t decide whether to sign in time for the deadline, which was extended by the parties from Feb. 3. ... Masto said in a statement she was reviewing the settlement and “advocating for improvements to address Nevada’s needs.”Makes me wonder: Will the Greek debt deal or the mortgage servicer settlement be announced first (or collapse first)?

Another update: I've been using inventory numbers from HousingTracker / DeptofNumbers to track changes in inventory. Tom Lawler mentioned this last year.

According to the deptofnumbers.com for monthly inventory (54 metro areas), listed inventory is probably back to early 2005 levels. Unfortunately the deptofnumbers only started tracking inventory in April 2006.

This graph shows the NAR estimate of existing home inventory through December (left axis) and the HousingTracker data for the 54 metro areas through February.

Click on graph for larger image.

Since the NAR released their revisions for sales and inventory, the NAR and HousingTracker inventory numbers have tracked pretty well.

Seasonally housing inventory usually bottoms in December and January and then starts to increase again in February. So inventory should increase over the next 6 months.

The second graph shows the year-over-year change in inventory for both the NAR and HousingTracker.

HousingTracker reported that the February listings - for the 54 metro areas - declined 21% from the same month last year. The year-over-year decline will probably start to slow since listed inventory is getting close to normal levels. Also if there is an increase in foreclosures (as expected), this will give some boost to listed inventory.

This is just inventory listed for sale, sometimes referred to as "visible inventory". There is also a large "shadow inventory" that is currently not on the market, but is expected to be listed in the next few years.

However listed inventory has clearly declined in many areas. And it is the listed months-of-supply (6.2 months as of December) combined with the number of distressed sales that mostly impacts prices.
All current existing home sales graphs

After my post this morning, The Housing Bottom is Here I was asked to update two graphs from 2009.

It is worth repeating: There are usually two bottoms for housing, the first for new home sales, housing starts and residential investment. The second bottom will be for house prices.

For the first bottom, we have several possible measures - the following graph shows three of the most commonly used: Starts, New Home Sales, and Residential Investment (RI) as a percent of GDP.

Click on graph for larger image.

The arrows point to some of the earlier peaks and troughs for these three measures.

The purpose of this graph is to show that these three indicators generally reach peaks and troughs together. Note that Residential Investment is quarterly and single-family starts and new home sales are monthly.

For the current housing bust, the bottom was spread over a few years from 2009 into 2011.

We could use any of these three measures to determine the first bottom, and then use the other two to confirm the bottom. But this says nothing about prices.

The second graph compares RI as a percent of GDP with the real Case-Shiller National house price index through Q3 2011. Prices continued to fall in Q4 and probably into 2012 too.

Although the Case-Shiller data only goes back to 1987, look at what happened following the early '90s housing bust. RI as a percent of GDP bottomed in Q1 1991, but real house prices didn't bottom until Q4 1996 - more than 5 years later!

Something similar will most likely happen again. But note this is REAL prices (adjusted for inflation). If the current price pattern follows the previous bust, real prices will gradually decline for a few years - however most homeowners care about nominal prices, and there is a good chance nominal Not Seasonally Adjusted (NSA) national prices will bottom in March - and then start moving mostly sideways.

No one has a crystal ball, and I provided the reasons for this forecast in the previous post.

There have been some recent articles arguing the “housing bottom is nowhere in sight”. That isn’t my view.

First there are two bottoms for housing. The first is for new home sales, housing starts and residential investment. The second bottom is for prices. Sometimes these bottoms can happen years apart.

For the economy and jobs, the bottom for housing starts and new home sales is more important than the bottom for prices. However individual homeowners and potential home buyers are naturally more interested in prices. So when we discuss a “bottom” for housing, we need to be clear on what we mean.

Click on graph for larger image.

For new home sales and housing starts, it appears the bottom is in, and I expect an increase in both starts and sales in 2012.

As the first graph shows, housing starts, both total and single family, bottomed in 2009 and have mostly moved sideways since then - with some distortions due to the ill-conceived housing tax credit.

New Home sales probably bottomed in mid-2010 and have flat lined since then.

Back in 2009, when I first wrote about the two bottoms, I thought we were close on housing starts and new home sales - but that it was "way too early to try to call the bottom in prices." In real terms, house prices have fallen another 10% to 15% since I wrote that post according to the CoreLogic and Case-Shiller house price indexes.

And it now appears we can look for the bottom in prices. My guess is that nominal house prices, using the national repeat sales indexes and not seasonally adjusted, will bottom in March 2012.

The problem with using the house price indexes to look for a bottom is that they are reported with a significant lag. As an example, the recently released Case-Shiller index was for November and the index is an average of September, October and November - so it is a report for several months ago. The CoreLogic index is a little more current - the recent release was for December, and CoreLogic uses a weighted average for prices (December weighted the most) - but that is still quite a lag.

Both of those indexes will bottom seasonally around March, and then start increasing again.

There are several reasons I think that house prices are close to a bottom. First prices are close to normal looking at the price-to-rent ratio and real prices (especially if prices fall another 4% to 5% NSA between the November Case-Shiller report and the March report). Second the large decline in listed inventory means less downward pressure on house prices, and third, I think that several policy initiatives will lessen the pressure from distressed sales (the probable mortgage settlement, the HARP refinance program, and more).

Of course these are national price indexes and there will be significant variability across the country. Areas with a large backlog of distressed properties - especially some states with a judicial foreclosure process - will probably see further price declines.

And this doesn't mean prices will increase significantly any time soon. Usually towards the end of a housing bust, nominal prices mostly move sideways for a few years, and real prices (adjusted for inflation) could even decline for another 2 or 3 years.

But most homeowners and home buyers focus on nominal prices and there is reasonable chance that the bottom is here.

Just a reminder that there are still quite a few commercial real estate (CRE) properties that are deep underwater:

From Bloomberg: Atlanta BofA Tower Auction Highlights Foreclosures (ht Mike In Long Island)Atlanta’s 55-story Bank of America Plaza, the tallest tower in the Southeast, is set to be sold at an open outcry auction on the steps of the Fulton County Courthouse tomorrow after landlord BentleyForbes missed mortgage payments. It bought the skyscraper in 2006 for $436 million ... the 1.25 million-square-foot building has lost 54 percent of its value ...

The $363 million Bank of America Plaza loan became delinquent in December ... was appraised in March at $202 million

“We’re hitting a tremendous amount of that debt coming due,” William Yowell, a vice chairman with CBRE Group Inc. in Atlanta, said in a telephone interview. That will cause “more distressed assets that come to market this year” and may lower the price per square foot on buildings, he said.

From the NY Times: Deal Is Closer for a U.S. Plan on Mortgage ReliefWith a deadline looming on Monday for state officials to sign onto a landmark multibillion-dollar settlement to address foreclosure abuses, the Obama administration is close to winning support from crucial states that would significantly expand the breadth of the deal.

The biggest remaining holdout, California, has returned to the negotiating table ... in the last few days, differences have narrowed in negotiations that one participant described as round the clock, with California officials in direct communication with bank representatives for the first time in months. ... Officials involved in the negotiations cautioned that broader state support could still be days away.I expect most states (if not all) to join the settlement.

Yesterday:
• Summary for Week ending February 3rd
• Schedule for Week of February 5th

From the Athens News: Lengthy and difficult negotiations A five-hour meeting between prime minister Lucas Papademos and the leaders of the three parties supporting the government ended without agreement on Sunday.

Pasok leader George Papandreou, main opposition New Democracy party leader Antonis Samaras and Popular Orthodox Rally (Laos) party leader George Karatzaferis failed to reach agreement with Papademos concerning the demands of the EU-IMF troika for private-sector wage cuts, further pension cuts, large-scale firing of public-sector staff and major downsizing of the public sector.
...
Main opposition New Democracy leader Antonis Samaras made no statements as he left the meeting but indicated the deadlock reached during the meeting during a brief statement to television cameras when he returned to ND's headquarters.

"For the first time, a negotiation is taking place. The country cannot stand more recession. I am fighting with every means to prevent this," he said, confirming that the negotiations will continue on Monday.More from the Financial Times: Deadlock for Greek austerity talks

Yesterday:
• Summary for Week ending February 3rd
• Schedule for Week of February 5th

By request, here is an update to four key indicators used by the NBER for business cycle dating: GDP, Employment, Industrial production and real personal income less transfer payments.

Note: The following graphs are all constructed as a percent of the peak in each indicator. This shows when the indicator has bottomed - and when the indicator has returned to the level of the previous peak. If the indicator is at a new peak, the value is 100%.

These graphs show that several major indicators are still significantly below the pre-recession peaks.

Click on graph for larger image.

This graph is for real GDP through Q4 2011. Real GDP returned to the pre-recession in Q3 2011, and Gross Domestic Income (not shown) returned to the pre-recession peak in Q2 - GDI for Q4 will be released with the 2nd estimate of GDP. (For a discussion of GDI, see here).

At the worst point, real GDP was off 5.1% from the 2007 peak. Real GDI was off 5.7% at the trough.

Real GDP has performed better than other indicators ...

This graph shows real personal income less transfer payments as a percent of the previous peak through December.

This measure was off 10.7% at the trough.

Real personal income less transfer payments is still 4.8% below the previous peak.

This graph is for industrial production through December.

Industrial production was off over 17% at the trough, and has been one of the stronger performing sectors during the recovery.

However industrial production is still 5.4% below the pre-recession peak, and it will probably be some time before industrial production returns to pre-recession levels.

The final graph is for employment. This is similar to the graph I post every month comparing percent payroll jobs lost in several recessions.

Payroll employment is still 4.1% below the pre-recession peak.

If the economy adds 243 thousand payroll jobs per month on average (the January report), it will take another 2 years to get back to the pre-recession employment peak. And that doesn't count growth of the working age population over the last 4+ years.

Yesterday:
• Summary for Week ending February 3rd
• Schedule for Week of February 5th

From the Athens News: Crucial meeting of coalition partners The crucial negotiation of the coalition political party leaders over the EC-ECB-IMF troika's ultimatums and shock measures has been set for 13:00 on Sunday.

In this new meeting of the leaders of three parties backing the interim government led by Lucas Papademos which will take place on Sunday, the prime minister is expected to present them with a document detailing the rigid positions of the troika. ... [reports are] the prime minister is thinking of resigning if the three do not manage to come to an agreement.From Reuters: Euro zone loses patience with GreeceEuro zone finance ministers told Greece on Saturday it could not go ahead with an agreed deal to restructure privately-held debt until it guaranteed it would implement reforms needed to secure a second financing package from the euro zone and the IMF.From the NY Times: Greek Talks at a Delicate Point, Official SaysThe Greek finance minister, Evangelos Venizelos, said on Saturday that talks between the government and its foreign creditors on a second rescue deal were “on a razor’s edge,” adding that though progress had been made on some levels, crucial issues were unresolved.

“Two major, interrelated issues remain unresolved — labor relations and wages in the private sector, and the fiscal measures that must be taken to ensure we are within the target for 2012,” Mr. Venizelos said after a two-hour conference call with euro zone officials. Despite the barriers, a deal must be reached in bailout talks by Sunday night, he said. Earlier:
• Summary for Week ending February 3rd
• Schedule for Week of February 5th

Earlier:
• Summary for Week ending February 3rd
• Schedule for Week of February 5th

From the Association of American Railroads (AAR): AAR Reports Gains for January Rail Traffic
The Association of American Railroads (AAR) reported that total U.S. rail carloads originated in January 2012 totaled 1,144,800, an average of 286,200 per week and up 0.1 percent over January 2011. Intermodal volume in January 2012 was 877,637 containers and trailers, up 1.7 percent over January 2011. January’s average of 219,409 intermodal units per week was the third highest ever for a January for U.S. railroads.
...
“Total rail carload traffic in January was flat compared with last year, due largely to sharp declines in coal and grain traffic,” said AAR Senior Vice President John T. Gray. “However, a number of other commodity categories — including many that have historically been much more highly correlated with GDP growth than coal and grain—saw large increases in January. That’s a sign that the underlying economy is probably stronger than you would think if you just looked at the rail traffic totals.” Click on graph for larger image.

This graph shows U.S. average weekly rail carloads (NSA).
On a non-seasonally adjusted basis, total U.S. rail carloads in January 2012 totaled 1,144,800, an average of 286,200 per week and up 0.1% over January 2011.Rail carload traffic collapsed in November 2008, and now, 2 1/2 years into the recovery, carload traffic is still not half way back to the pre-recession levels.

The second graph is for intermodal traffic (using intermodal or shipping containers):

Graphs reprinted with permission.

Intermodal traffic is close to the peak year in 2006.
U.S. rail intermodal volume in January 2012 was 877,637 containers and trailers, up 1.7% over January 2011. January’s average of 219,409 intermodal units per week was the third highest ever for a January for U.S. railroads.
All Current Transportation graphs

Earlier:
• Summary for Week ending February 3rd

This will be a light week for economic releases. The key economic release is the December trade balance report to be released on Friday.

Also on Friday Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke will speak to the National Association of Homebuilders: "Housing Markets in Transition".

Europe will be a focus, especially any announcements about Greece. Also the ECB holds a meeting on Thursday.

The mortgage settlement might be announced this coming week too.

----- Monday, Feb 6th-----
No releases scheduled.

----- Tuesday, Feb 7th -----
10:00 AM ET: Job Openings and Labor Turnover Survey for December from the BLS.

This graph shows job openings (yellow line), hires (purple), Layoff, Discharges and other (red column), and Quits (light blue column) from the JOLTS.

In general, the number of job openings (yellow) has been trending up, and were up about 7% year-over-year compared to November 2010.

10:00 AM: Testimony from Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke, "The Economic Outlook and the Federal Budget Situation", Before the Committee on the Budget, U.S. Senate (repeat of House testimony).

3:00 PM: Consumer Credit for December. The consensus is for a $7.0 billion increase in consumer credit.

----- Wednesday, Feb 8th -----
7:00 AM: The Mortgage Bankers Association (MBA) will release the mortgage purchase applications index. This index was especially weak last year, although this does not include all the cash buyers.

----- Thursday, Feb 9th -----
8:30 AM: The initial weekly unemployment claims report will be released. The consensus is for an increase to 370,000 from 367,000 last week.

10:00 AM: Monthly Wholesale Trade: Sales and Inventories for December. The consensus is for a 0.5% increase in inventories.

----- Friday, Feb 10th -----
8:30 AM: Trade Balance report for December from the Census Bureau.

Imports have been mostly moving sideways for the past six months (seasonally adjusted). Exports are well above the pre-recession peak and up 10% compared to November 2010; imports are up about 13% compared to November 2010.

The consensus is for the U.S. trade deficit to increase to $48.5 billion in December, up from from $47.8 billion in November. Export activity to Europe will be closely watched.

9:55 AM: Reuters/University of Mich Consumer Sentiment preliminary for February.

The final January Reuters / University of Michigan consumer sentiment index increased to 75.0, up from the December reading of 69.9.

The consensus is for a decrease in February to 74.3 from 75.0 in January.

12:30 PM: Speech by Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke, "Housing Markets in Transition", At the 2012 National Association of Homebuilders International Builders' Show, Orlando, Florida